<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>InfoQ - Code Reviews - News</title>
    <link>https://www.infoq.com</link>
    <description>InfoQ Code Reviews News feed</description>
    <item>
      <title>Anthropic Says Nobody Needs a Mental Model of Claude Code. Practitioners Are Testing That</title>
      <link>https://www.infoq.com/news/2026/10/anthropic-code-review/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=Code+Reviews-news</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="https://res.infoq.com/news/2026/10/anthropic-code-review/en/headerimage/generatedHeaderImage-1792959100117.jpg"/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anthropic has published how the Claude Code team reviews code now that Claude writes roughly 90% of it, including a claim that nobody keeps a complete mental model of the codebase. The post documents a pull request that ran more than fifty review rounds overnight, a reviewer spending most of its effort on pre-existing code, and a control the team says it does not yet have.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;i&gt;By Steef-Jan Wiggers&lt;/i&gt;</description>
      <category>Code Reviews</category>
      <category>Anthropic</category>
      <category>AI, ML &amp; Data Engineering</category>
      <category>Culture &amp; Methods</category>
      <category>Architecture &amp; Design</category>
      <category>Development</category>
      <category>news</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 09:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.infoq.com/news/2026/10/anthropic-code-review/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=Code+Reviews-news</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steef-Jan Wiggers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-10-29T09:58:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:identifier>/news/2026/10/anthropic-code-review/en</dc:identifier>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
