<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>InfoQ - OpenAI</title>
    <link>https://www.infoq.com</link>
    <description>InfoQ OpenAI feed</description>
    <item>
      <title>Presentation: The Agent Harness: Control Planes, Invariants, and Approval Boundaries for Production AI Agents</title>
      <link>https://www.infoq.com/presentations/ai-agent-harness/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=OpenAI</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="https://res.infoq.com/presentations/ai-agent-harness/en/mediumimage/vino-medium-1789631870270.jpeg"/&gt;&lt;p&gt;OpenAI’s Vinoth Govindarajan discusses why production AI agents fail beyond model hallucination. Using real-world case studies like OpenClaw, he explains the key principles of reliable agent harnesses: establishing explicit state ownership, serializing concurrent state mutations, scoping execution authority, and validating actions at the user-visible edge.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;i&gt;By Vinoth Govindarajan&lt;/i&gt;</description>
      <category>Large language models</category>
      <category>Agents</category>
      <category>Transcripts</category>
      <category>QCon AI Boston 2026</category>
      <category>OpenAI</category>
      <category>Architecture</category>
      <category>Distributed Systems</category>
      <category>AI Harness</category>
      <category>AI, ML &amp; Data Engineering</category>
      <category>Development</category>
      <category>Architecture &amp; Design</category>
      <category>presentation</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.infoq.com/presentations/ai-agent-harness/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=OpenAI</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vinoth Govindarajan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-21T11:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:identifier>/presentations/ai-agent-harness/en</dc:identifier>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OpenAI Introduces Triage Framework and Case Studies to Report Model Misalignment</title>
      <link>https://www.infoq.com/news/2026/09/openai-misalignment-framework/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=OpenAI</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="https://res.infoq.com/news/2026/09/openai-misalignment-framework/en/headerimage/generatedHeaderImage-1789701944081.jpg"/&gt;&lt;p&gt;OpenAI has released a disclosure framework for model misalignment during its lifecycle. Employees can flag potential issues, prompting technical staff to label incidents. The initial case studies outline unexpected model behaviours, providing insights into deviations from expected parameters. Community reactions show both approval and scepticism regarding transparency and corporate narratives.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;i&gt;By Olimpiu Pop&lt;/i&gt;</description>
      <category>AI Misalignment</category>
      <category>Frontier Model</category>
      <category>OpenAI</category>
      <category>AI, ML &amp; Data Engineering</category>
      <category>news</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 05:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.infoq.com/news/2026/09/openai-misalignment-framework/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=OpenAI</guid>
      <dc:creator>Olimpiu Pop</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-18T05:05:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:identifier>/news/2026/09/openai-misalignment-framework/en</dc:identifier>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Independent Investigation of Hugging Face Incident Reveals How Agents Collaborated and Behaved</title>
      <link>https://www.infoq.com/news/2026/09/metr-hugging-face-hack-report/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=OpenAI</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="https://res.infoq.com/news/2026/09/metr-hugging-face-hack-report/en/headerimage/hugging-chat-open-source-1789376267412.jpeg"/&gt;&lt;p&gt;After six days of on-site investigation at OpenAI, a small team of METR and Redwood Research researchers provided an account of how OpenAI agents behaved during their hack of Hugging Face earlier this year. Roughly 700 agents that were meant to be isolated from one another found a way to communicate and coordinate to pursue goals they could have not achieved working individually.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;i&gt;By Sergio De Simone&lt;/i&gt;</description>
      <category>Large language models</category>
      <category>Agents</category>
      <category>Security Vulnerabilities</category>
      <category>OpenAI</category>
      <category>Hugging Face</category>
      <category>AI, ML &amp; Data Engineering</category>
      <category>Development</category>
      <category>news</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.infoq.com/news/2026/09/metr-hugging-face-hack-report/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=OpenAI</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sergio De Simone</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-14T09:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:identifier>/news/2026/09/metr-hugging-face-hack-report/en</dc:identifier>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
