<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>InfoQ - AI, ML &amp; Data Engineering - Articles</title>
    <link>https://www.infoq.com</link>
    <description>InfoQ AI, ML &amp; Data Engineering Articles feed</description>
    <item>
      <title>Article: LLM Reliability Layers Under Test: Accuracy, Yield, and the Limits of Verification</title>
      <link>https://www.infoq.com/articles/llm-reliability-layers-limits-accuracy/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=AI%2C+ML+%26+Data+Engineering-articles</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="https://res.infoq.com/articles/llm-reliability-layers-limits-accuracy/en/headerimage/llm-reliability-layers-limits-accuracy-header-1793873839325.jpg"/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Verification layers sort outputs by trust rather than fixing errors. In a benchmark of six reliability layers, voting and self-correction failed to recover accuracy - they only withheld doubtful records. Production systems gain more reliability by replacing generation with deterministic lookups, tracking yield over raw accuracy, and resolving extraction bottlenecks before stacking checks.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;i&gt;By Pushpdeep Mishra, Wejdan Bagais&lt;/i&gt;</description>
      <category>Verification</category>
      <category>AI Architecture</category>
      <category>Machine Learning</category>
      <category>Software Engineering</category>
      <category>AI Engineering Certification</category>
      <category>Reliability</category>
      <category>Large language models</category>
      <category>InfoQ Certification Program</category>
      <category>AI, ML &amp; Data Engineering</category>
      <category>article</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.infoq.com/articles/llm-reliability-layers-limits-accuracy/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=AI%2C+ML+%26+Data+Engineering-articles</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pushpdeep Mishra, Wejdan Bagais</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-11-10T09:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:identifier>/articles/llm-reliability-layers-limits-accuracy/en</dc:identifier>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Article: Systemic Approach to Memory, Knowledge, and Context in Agentic AI Architectures</title>
      <link>https://www.infoq.com/articles/agentic-ai-context-memory-knowledge/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=AI%2C+ML+%26+Data+Engineering-articles</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="https://res.infoq.com/articles/agentic-ai-context-memory-knowledge/en/headerimage/agentic-ai-context-memory-knowledge-header-1793173492489.jpg"/&gt;&lt;p&gt;The article argues that reliable agentic AI architecture depends on a context engine that selects, injects, compresses, and expires information before it reaches the model. It separates context, memory, and knowledge, and recommends tiered memory, curated knowledge, and token budgeting. It also covers common anti-patterns, such as context stuffing and stale data loops, with mitigations.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;i&gt;By Adi Polak&lt;/i&gt;</description>
      <category>Agentic AI Architecture</category>
      <category>Memory</category>
      <category>Context Engineering</category>
      <category>Large language models</category>
      <category>Architecture &amp; Design</category>
      <category>AI, ML &amp; Data Engineering</category>
      <category>article</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.infoq.com/articles/agentic-ai-context-memory-knowledge/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=AI%2C+ML+%26+Data+Engineering-articles</guid>
      <dc:creator>Adi Polak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-11-02T11:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:identifier>/articles/agentic-ai-context-memory-knowledge/en</dc:identifier>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
