<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>InfoQ - Change</title>
    <link>https://www.infoq.com</link>
    <description>InfoQ Change feed</description>
    <item>
      <title>Making Retrospectives Effective with Small Concrete Actions and Rotating Facilitators</title>
      <link>https://www.infoq.com/news/2026/03/effective-retrospectives/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=Change</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="https://res.infoq.com/news/2026/03/effective-retrospectives/en/headerimage/generatedHeaderImage-1772616486818.jpg"/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Teams can run regular retrospectives that focus on 1–2 concrete weekly actions to avoid complaint circles, Natan Žabkar Nordberg mentioned at QCon London.  You can rotate facilitators to build ownership, with each one bringing their own unique perspective. He suggested framing bigger changes as 4–6 week experiments, then vote to keep, tweak, or revert, ensuring learning and continuous improvement.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;i&gt;By Ben Linders&lt;/i&gt;</description>
      <category>QCon London 2025</category>
      <category>QCon Software Development Conference</category>
      <category>Continuous Improvement</category>
      <category>Retrospectives</category>
      <category>Agile</category>
      <category>Change</category>
      <category>learning</category>
      <category>Culture &amp; Methods</category>
      <category>news</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 11:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.infoq.com/news/2026/03/effective-retrospectives/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=Change</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ben Linders</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-12T11:15:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:identifier>/news/2026/03/effective-retrospectives/en</dc:identifier>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
