<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>InfoQ - .NET Languages - Articles</title>
    <link>https://www.infoq.com</link>
    <description>InfoQ .NET Languages Articles feed</description>
    <item>
      <title>Article: Building Functional .NET Applications: a Guide for Choosing between F# vs C#</title>
      <link>https://www.infoq.com/articles/functional-dotnet-development/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=.NET+Languages-articles</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="https://res.infoq.com/articles/functional-dotnet-development/en/headerimage/Fsharp-vs-Csharp-is-one-more-functional-than-the-other-header-1676023056578.jpg"/&gt;&lt;p&gt;C# and F# are languages, each with growing user bases, that approach functional programming in fundamentally different ways. C# relies on object-oriented, imperative principles, and F# relies on functional principles.  Some developers are using F# as a complement to C#, rather than relying on the functional capabilities that exist natively in C#.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;i&gt;By Nahla Davies&lt;/i&gt;</description>
      <category>F#</category>
      <category>.NET</category>
      <category>Functional Programming</category>
      <category>C#</category>
      <category>Architecture &amp; Design</category>
      <category>Development</category>
      <category>article</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.infoq.com/articles/functional-dotnet-development/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=.NET+Languages-articles</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nahla Davies</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-15T09:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:identifier>/articles/functional-dotnet-development/en</dc:identifier>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
