<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>InfoQ - Large language models - Articles</title>
    <link>https://www.infoq.com</link>
    <description>InfoQ Large language models Articles feed</description>
    <item>
      <title>Article: LLM Reliability Layers Under Test: Accuracy, Yield, and the Limits of Verification</title>
      <link>https://www.infoq.com/articles/llm-reliability-layers-limits-accuracy/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=Large+language+models-articles</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="https://res.infoq.com/articles/llm-reliability-layers-limits-accuracy/en/headerimage/llm-reliability-layers-limits-accuracy-header-1793873839325.jpg"/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Verification layers sort outputs by trust rather than fixing errors. In a benchmark of six reliability layers, voting and self-correction failed to recover accuracy - they only withheld doubtful records. Production systems gain more reliability by replacing generation with deterministic lookups, tracking yield over raw accuracy, and resolving extraction bottlenecks before stacking checks.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;i&gt;By Pushpdeep Mishra, Wejdan Bagais&lt;/i&gt;</description>
      <category>Machine Learning</category>
      <category>AI Architecture</category>
      <category>InfoQ Certification Program</category>
      <category>Reliability</category>
      <category>Verification</category>
      <category>Software Engineering</category>
      <category>AI Engineering Certification</category>
      <category>Large language models</category>
      <category>AI, ML &amp; Data Engineering</category>
      <category>article</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.infoq.com/articles/llm-reliability-layers-limits-accuracy/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=Large+language+models-articles</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pushpdeep Mishra, Wejdan Bagais</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-11-10T09:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:identifier>/articles/llm-reliability-layers-limits-accuracy/en</dc:identifier>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Article: Agentic AI Architecture: Current Challenges and Future Opportunities</title>
      <link>https://www.infoq.com/articles/agentic-ai-architecture-challenges-opportunities/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=Large+language+models-articles</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="https://res.infoq.com/articles/agentic-ai-architecture-challenges-opportunities/en/headerimage/agentic-ai-architecture-challenges-opportunities-header-1793709540690.jpg"/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Agentic AI architecture extends microservices and cloud-native architectures with AI agents that work with context, memory, and protocols such as MCP and A2A. The article covers bounded-context integration, task-dependent coordination strategies, new security risks, and observability needs. It expects gradual adoption alongside existing architectures, with platforms absorbing common components.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;i&gt;By Rafał Gancarz&lt;/i&gt;</description>
      <category>Agentic AI Architecture</category>
      <category>Model Context Protocol (MCP)</category>
      <category>Context Engineering</category>
      <category>Retrieval-Augmented Generation</category>
      <category>Large language models</category>
      <category>Architecture &amp; Design</category>
      <category>article</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 10:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.infoq.com/articles/agentic-ai-architecture-challenges-opportunities/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=Large+language+models-articles</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rafał Gancarz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-11-09T10:52:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:identifier>/articles/agentic-ai-architecture-challenges-opportunities/en</dc:identifier>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Article: Systemic Approach to Memory, Knowledge, and Context in Agentic AI Architectures</title>
      <link>https://www.infoq.com/articles/agentic-ai-context-memory-knowledge/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=Large+language+models-articles</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="https://res.infoq.com/articles/agentic-ai-context-memory-knowledge/en/headerimage/agentic-ai-context-memory-knowledge-header-1793173492489.jpg"/&gt;&lt;p&gt;The article argues that reliable agentic AI architecture depends on a context engine that selects, injects, compresses, and expires information before it reaches the model. It separates context, memory, and knowledge, and recommends tiered memory, curated knowledge, and token budgeting. It also covers common anti-patterns, such as context stuffing and stale data loops, with mitigations.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;i&gt;By Adi Polak&lt;/i&gt;</description>
      <category>Agentic AI Architecture</category>
      <category>Memory</category>
      <category>Context Engineering</category>
      <category>Large language models</category>
      <category>Architecture &amp; Design</category>
      <category>AI, ML &amp; Data Engineering</category>
      <category>article</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.infoq.com/articles/agentic-ai-context-memory-knowledge/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=Large+language+models-articles</guid>
      <dc:creator>Adi Polak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-11-02T11:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:identifier>/articles/agentic-ai-context-memory-knowledge/en</dc:identifier>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
