<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>InfoQ - Stakeholder - Articles</title>
    <link>https://www.infoq.com</link>
    <description>InfoQ Stakeholder Articles feed</description>
    <item>
      <title>Article: Finding Adequate Metrics for Outer, Inner, and Process Quality in Software Development</title>
      <link>https://www.infoq.com/articles/metrics-quality-software/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=Stakeholder-articles</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="https://res.infoq.com/articles/metrics-quality-software/en/headerimage/finding-adequate-metrics-for-process-quality-in-software-development-header-1673953064693.jpg"/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Implementing a feature can be measured. Quality is harder to measure. This article explores how to balance improving quality and adding new features. It dives into different domains of quality: Outer quality which is owned by the product people (e.g. product owners, testers), inner quality owned by the developers, and process quality owned by managers.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;i&gt;By Michael Kutz&lt;/i&gt;</description>
      <category>Delivering Quality</category>
      <category>Metrics</category>
      <category>Quality</category>
      <category>Stakeholder</category>
      <category>Process</category>
      <category>Customers &amp; Requirements</category>
      <category>Agile Conferences</category>
      <category>Culture &amp; Methods</category>
      <category>article</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.infoq.com/articles/metrics-quality-software/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&amp;utm_source=infoq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_term=Stakeholder-articles</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michael Kutz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-19T09:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:identifier>/articles/metrics-quality-software/en</dc:identifier>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
